Is Email Still Worth It… or Did LinkedIn Replace the List?

For years, marketing advice was painfully consistent:

“Build the email list.”

It was non-negotiable.
Email was king.
Your ESP bill was just the cost of doing business.

Then LinkedIn happened.

Creators started pulling in tens of thousands of impressions from a single post. Brands began landing clients straight from comment sections. And suddenly, people started asking the quiet question out loud:

Is sending emails still worth it—or is LinkedIn the new “list”?

Let’s unpack it.

Why Email Is Getting Side-Eyed Right Now

Email marketing isn’t dead.
But it is being questioned—and for good reason.

1. You Pay to Talk to People Who Already Opted In

Email platforms charge based on subscriber count. So the bigger your list gets, the more you pay—even if a chunk of it never opens.

LinkedIn?
Posting is free.
Distribution is built in.
And your reach isn’t capped by how many people opted in three years ago.

2. Deliverability Is a Nightmare

Spam filters, promotions tabs, Apple privacy updates—email open rates are basically vibes at this point.

Meanwhile, LinkedIn posts show up:

  • Next to coworkers’ updates

  • Between industry news

  • Right in the daily scroll

No spam folder. No “mark as important.” Just… visibility.

3. LinkedIn Rewards Ideas, Not Infrastructure

To send emails well, you need:

  • An ESP

  • Automations

  • Templates

  • Segmentation

  • Deliverability know-how

To post on LinkedIn, you need:

  • A point of view

  • A hook

  • And the courage to hit “Post”

That simplicity is hard to ignore.

LinkedIn Is the New List (With One Catch)

Let’s be honest:
Your LinkedIn audience functions like a list.

You can:

  • Show up consistently

  • Share insights

  • Start conversations

  • Drive inbound leads

And you can do all of it without paying a monthly platform fee.

The catch?

You don’t own it.

Algorithms change. Reach fluctuates. Accounts get throttled. What works today might disappear tomorrow.

LinkedIn is powerful—but it’s rented attention.

So… Is Email Still Worth It?

Short answer: Yes. But not by itself.

Email still does things LinkedIn never will:

  • Guaranteed delivery (no algorithm roulette)

  • Long-form storytelling

  • Predictable conversions

  • Audience ownership

LinkedIn is incredible for discovery.
Email is incredible for depth.

One gets you noticed.
The other turns interest into revenue.

The Real Question Isn’t Email vs. LinkedIn

It’s this:

Why are you paying for email if LinkedIn is doing all the top-of-funnel work for free?

And the follow-up:

Why rely entirely on LinkedIn when you don’t own the relationship?

The strongest brands don’t pick sides.
They build systems.

They use LinkedIn to:

  • Build trust publicly

  • Test messaging in real time

  • Attract the right people

Then they use email to:

  • Go deeper

  • Nurture intentionally

  • Convert on their own terms

The Smart Play Going Forward

Email isn’t dead.
LinkedIn isn’t a replacement.
And “build the list” isn’t bad advice—it’s just incomplete.

The future isn’t about choosing channels.
It’s about deciding what you rent, what you own, and what you stop paying for.

The Bottom Line

  • LinkedIn is today’s fastest attention engine

  • Email is still the strongest owned asset

  • Paying for tools without a system is the real waste

If your strategy is:

  • “Just post more” → fragile

  • “Just send emails” → slow

But together?
That’s where things compound.

Want Help Figuring Out What Your Brand Actually Needs?

Still debating whether to double down on email—or ride LinkedIn as far as it’ll take you?

Don’t guess.

Ritner Digital helps brands design audience systems that turn attention into owned growth—without wasting money on tools they don’t need.

👉🏼 Ready for a smarter growth strategy?
Work with Ritner Digital


FAQs

Is email marketing still effective in 2026?

Yes—but only when it’s part of a bigger system.

Email works best when it’s supporting trust that’s already been built elsewhere (like LinkedIn). Cold lists, bloated automations, and “just send the newsletter” strategies are what stopped working—not email itself.

Can LinkedIn completely replace an email list?

For attention? Maybe.
For ownership? No.

LinkedIn is phenomenal for reach and credibility, but you don’t own the audience. Email is still the only channel where you control access, data, and timing.

Why pay for an ESP when LinkedIn posts are free?

Because “free” doesn’t mean stable.

LinkedIn reach can change overnight. Email costs money—but it gives you predictability, control, and a direct line to people who’ve raised their hand.

The smartest brands use LinkedIn to earn attention and email to compound it.

What types of businesses benefit most from LinkedIn-first strategies?

  • B2B companies

  • Consultants and service providers

  • Agencies

  • Founders with a strong POV

If trust and credibility drive your sales, LinkedIn is one of the fastest places to build it.

What types of businesses should prioritize email more heavily?

  • Ecommerce brands

  • Subscription products

  • High-volume promotions

  • Companies with repeat purchase cycles

If you rely on retention and repeat sales, email still plays a major role.

Should we stop investing in email altogether?

Not unless you’re comfortable rebuilding your audience from scratch every time a platform changes.

Email isn’t about daily growth—it’s about long-term leverage.

How do LinkedIn and email actually work best together?

Simple:

  1. Use LinkedIn to test ideas and attract the right audience

  2. Invite engaged followers into your email ecosystem

  3. Use email to nurture, educate, and convert

Attention first. Ownership second.

What does Ritner Digital actually help with here?

We help brands:

  • Decide which channels matter for their stage

  • Avoid overspending on tools they don’t need

  • Build audience systems that turn attention into revenue

No dogma. No “you must do this.” Just what works.

Related Reads

〰️

Related Reads 〰️

Should Executives Write Personal Posts on the Company Blog?

Should executives write personal posts on the company blog—or is that bad for SEO? We break down when thought leadership helps, when it doesn’t, and how to make it work without hurting performance.

Read More →

Why “Last Day to Register!” Doesn’t Work on Pebble Beach Executives

Marketing to executives isn’t about urgency—it’s about credibility. In executive-heavy markets like Pebble Beach, “last chance” email blasts fall flat. Here’s why social proof, positioning, and peer alignment matter far more than discounts or deadlines.

Read More →

We Forgot to Suppress the Executive Board

You can build the perfect event campaign and still mess it up by forgetting one thing: executive suppression. When board members and senior stakeholders receive promotional emails meant for your marketable audience, it doesn’t just feel awkward—it signals a lack of judgment. This post breaks down why it happens, why it matters, and how smarter campaign architecture prevents it.

Read More →

Previous
Previous

Why Familiar Brands Feel Safer (Even When They’re Worse)

Next
Next

Should Executives Write Personal Posts on the Company Blog?